Thursday, 2 January 2014
Pacific Rim (2013)
Category by FTI Movie House: Action
Description and Synopsis:
Description: “[The] Pacific Rim is a 2013 American science fiction monster film. . . .
[It envisions to be] an earnest [and] colorful adventure story, with an ‘incredibly airy and light feel,’ in contrast to the ‘super brooding, super dark, [and] cynical summer movie.’ . . . [Its] director focused on [the] ‘big, beautiful, and sophisticated visuals’ and action[s] that would satisfy . . . adult audience, but . . . [has expressed] his ‘real hope’ . . . to introduce the kaiju and mecha genres to . . . [the young] generation [as well]. While the film draws heavily on these genres, it avoids direct references to previous works. . . . [He also] intended to create something original, but ‘madly in love’ with its influences instilled with ‘epic beauty’ and ‘operatic grandeur.’ . . . [This] film [also gives credit] to Ray Harryhausen and IshirÅ Honda who helped . . . establish the giant monster genre . . . [on] films such as The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms and Godzilla, respectively.
The . . . [Pacific Rim] was produced by Legendary Pictures and distributed by Warner Bros. It was released on July 12, 2013, including releases in 3-D and IMAX 3D, receiving generally positive reviews. . . , [and its] visual effects and action sequences were highly praised. The film was a moderate success in the United States, but was highly successful in other territories earning more than $407 million worldwide.”
Synopsis: “[S]et in the 2020’s, when the Earth is at war with the Kaijus, and colossal monsters . . . have emerged” on the floor of the Pacific Ocean from an interdimensional portal”; “humanity, [to combat the monsters], unites to create the Jaegers: gigantic humanoid mecha . . . controlled by two pilots each whose minds are joined by a neural bridge. Focusing on the war's later days, the story follows Raleigh Becket, a washed-up Jaeger pilot called out of retirement and teamed [up] with rookie pilot Mako Mori as part of [the] last-ditch effort to defeat the Kaijus.”
Directed by: Guillermo del Toro
Produced by: Thomas Tull, Jon Jashni, Guillermo del Toro, and Mary Parent
Screenplay by: Travis Beacham and Guillermo del Toro
Story by: Travis Beacham
Starring: Charlie Hunnam, Idris Elba, Rinko Kikuchi, Charlie Day, Robert Kazinsky, Max Martini, and Ron Perlman
Music by: Ramin Djawadi
Cinematography by: Guillermo Navarro
Editing by: Peter Amundson and John Gilroy
[It envisions to be] an earnest [and] colorful adventure story, with an ‘incredibly airy and light feel,’ in contrast to the ‘super brooding, super dark, [and] cynical summer movie.’ . . . [Its] director focused on [the] ‘big, beautiful, and sophisticated visuals’ and action[s] that would satisfy . . . adult audience, but . . . [has expressed] his ‘real hope’ . . . to introduce the kaiju and mecha genres to . . . [the young] generation [as well]. While the film draws heavily on these genres, it avoids direct references to previous works. . . . [He also] intended to create something original, but ‘madly in love’ with its influences instilled with ‘epic beauty’ and ‘operatic grandeur.’ . . . [This] film [also gives credit] to Ray Harryhausen and IshirÅ Honda who helped . . . establish the giant monster genre . . . [on] films such as The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms and Godzilla, respectively.
The . . . [Pacific Rim] was produced by Legendary Pictures and distributed by Warner Bros. It was released on July 12, 2013, including releases in 3-D and IMAX 3D, receiving generally positive reviews. . . , [and its] visual effects and action sequences were highly praised. The film was a moderate success in the United States, but was highly successful in other territories earning more than $407 million worldwide.”
Synopsis: “[S]et in the 2020’s, when the Earth is at war with the Kaijus, and colossal monsters . . . have emerged” on the floor of the Pacific Ocean from an interdimensional portal”; “humanity, [to combat the monsters], unites to create the Jaegers: gigantic humanoid mecha . . . controlled by two pilots each whose minds are joined by a neural bridge. Focusing on the war's later days, the story follows Raleigh Becket, a washed-up Jaeger pilot called out of retirement and teamed [up] with rookie pilot Mako Mori as part of [the] last-ditch effort to defeat the Kaijus.”
Directed by: Guillermo del Toro
Produced by: Thomas Tull, Jon Jashni, Guillermo del Toro, and Mary Parent
Screenplay by: Travis Beacham and Guillermo del Toro
Story by: Travis Beacham
Starring: Charlie Hunnam, Idris Elba, Rinko Kikuchi, Charlie Day, Robert Kazinsky, Max Martini, and Ron Perlman
Music by: Ramin Djawadi
Cinematography by: Guillermo Navarro
Editing by: Peter Amundson and John Gilroy
Wednesday, 1 January 2014
"A Shining Example"
THE WOLF OF WALL STREET was the best movie of 2013. Everything about it just simply kills, from the acting to the directing to the script to the editing to the simple fact that it's a film with the crackling, in-the-moment, balls-out energy you'd expect from a bold young voice fresh out of film school... made by a living-legend in his 70s.
Unfortunately, it's also a movie getting dogged by some critics (and audiences) for what some see as an insufficiently clear-cut condemnation of it's title character; by which they generally seem to mean that the film doesn't go out of it's way to make all of the fun stuff Jordan Belfort and company did with their ill-gotten millions look "not fun" in order to make a point. This, of course, displays a fundamental lack of understanding of the film, reality, how movies are made, etc. Simply put: A.) On a basic narrative level, if these guys' "playtime" doesn't look enjoyable to the audience, you're undercutting the fundamental story/character question of "why did they DO this???," and B.) Not to be crass about it, but neither Martin Scorsese nor anyone else needs to "make" cocaine-fueled orgies with top-dollar call girls "look like fun" - that stuff already looks like a ton of fun - that's just the movie being honest.
This, on the other hand, is a little trickier to deal with...
That's a promotional clip recorded by Leonardo DiCaprio for Keppler Speakers, a talent/booking agency for motivational speakers that has the actual Jordan Belfort as a client, in which the actor endorses his real-world counterpart's skill at the motivation game.
It's pretty meta, when you consider that Belfort effectively returns the favor by playing an emcee introducing DiCaprio as himself at one of these motivational gigs in the film, but I can't imagine DiCaprio or the film's producers are happy to see this clip (which has been around since August) going viral now. There's nothing especially "bad" going on here (the one thing everyone seems to agree on is that this bastard was a hell of a salesman) but it certainly won't help quiet the moral-wailers to be on tape talking glowingly about Belfort as an example of "the transformative power of ambition and hard work" playing opposite the more recent party-line of "he sucks and our movie clearly shows that he sucks."
Me, I'm mostly amused by it because it's effectively a real-world continuation of the film's overall point: These guys get away with it. They do short stints in white-collar "prison," they stay rich, they get played by handsome movie stars in big Hollywood movies (Belfort already had a foot in the film industry via executive producing Hulk Hogan's Christmas movie - really), and it all happens because "we" are always and forever complicit in it. Of course this guy (who literally cheats death and all other karmic punishments multiple times in the film) gets the actor playing him (as a raving sociopath) in the movie to make a commercial for him. That's just how it works - the perfect post-credits stinger; though one that could likely help cost DiCaprio his Best Actor statue.
Unfortunately, it's also a movie getting dogged by some critics (and audiences) for what some see as an insufficiently clear-cut condemnation of it's title character; by which they generally seem to mean that the film doesn't go out of it's way to make all of the fun stuff Jordan Belfort and company did with their ill-gotten millions look "not fun" in order to make a point. This, of course, displays a fundamental lack of understanding of the film, reality, how movies are made, etc. Simply put: A.) On a basic narrative level, if these guys' "playtime" doesn't look enjoyable to the audience, you're undercutting the fundamental story/character question of "why did they DO this???," and B.) Not to be crass about it, but neither Martin Scorsese nor anyone else needs to "make" cocaine-fueled orgies with top-dollar call girls "look like fun" - that stuff already looks like a ton of fun - that's just the movie being honest.
This, on the other hand, is a little trickier to deal with...
That's a promotional clip recorded by Leonardo DiCaprio for Keppler Speakers, a talent/booking agency for motivational speakers that has the actual Jordan Belfort as a client, in which the actor endorses his real-world counterpart's skill at the motivation game.
It's pretty meta, when you consider that Belfort effectively returns the favor by playing an emcee introducing DiCaprio as himself at one of these motivational gigs in the film, but I can't imagine DiCaprio or the film's producers are happy to see this clip (which has been around since August) going viral now. There's nothing especially "bad" going on here (the one thing everyone seems to agree on is that this bastard was a hell of a salesman) but it certainly won't help quiet the moral-wailers to be on tape talking glowingly about Belfort as an example of "the transformative power of ambition and hard work" playing opposite the more recent party-line of "he sucks and our movie clearly shows that he sucks."
Me, I'm mostly amused by it because it's effectively a real-world continuation of the film's overall point: These guys get away with it. They do short stints in white-collar "prison," they stay rich, they get played by handsome movie stars in big Hollywood movies (Belfort already had a foot in the film industry via executive producing Hulk Hogan's Christmas movie - really), and it all happens because "we" are always and forever complicit in it. Of course this guy (who literally cheats death and all other karmic punishments multiple times in the film) gets the actor playing him (as a raving sociopath) in the movie to make a commercial for him. That's just how it works - the perfect post-credits stinger; though one that could likely help cost DiCaprio his Best Actor statue.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




